Hangars & P.E.T

Discussion in 'General Archive' started by -AdamantiumDragon-, Jul 3, 2014.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. I think that P.E.T's Gears and protocols should be possible to install in P.E.T in all hangars, even though you have only one of each.

    Why?

    Because we have only one pet, therefore it's stupid, that each hangar requires to P.E.T it's own gears and protocols.
    It doesn't make sense.

    Another P.E.T idea!
    http://fi.bigpoint.com/darkorbit/board/threads/future-p-e-t-designs.49166/
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2014
    Tarron and SauronL like this.
  2. we can then fight over if we had 10 golis with diff deigns and should be able to put items on 1 and have them on them all cos there all the same ship
     
  3. It's not same thing o_O

    Then you would have many Goliath's, but you have bought only one P.E.T.
    Therefore you have only one P.E.T witch switch it's position between hangars.
     
  4. whoeva

    whoeva User

    I think we should be grateful they didn't make us buy a new pet for each hangar along with a new set of drones ;)
     
    Tarron and Silviu like this.
  5. it is the same thing.
     
  6. SauronL

    SauronL User

    love that idea ♥ :)
     
  7. Yes, that's true, but i can't put aside fact, that we are pushed to buy loads of extra items, in order to make stuff work properly.

    This is just one of the many "schemes" of bigpoint, that annoys like hell.

    I'd like you to explain how exactly (many) is same as (one)
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2014
  8. 1 PET and up to 10 ships, yup :mad:
     
  9. Note: The thread will be re-opened only if the OP requests for it.

    Enjoy the game.

    Closing due to inactivity.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.