[UI] Death field

Discussion in 'General Archive' started by R3V3R4NT, Jul 26, 2015.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. That's not the point. The point is that it's OP and the consensus so far has been no.
     
  2. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    That is no reason to quit. I'm here to assist.
     
  3. The idea is OP and you haven't fixed that. You can't assist when none is needed. Say a team of citadels goes into LoW with this with 4 mil shields, get every beacon killing nothing and activate falcon then absorb 4 mil damage then release a wave of 600k damage. Two citadels doing that let alone a team would be able to do a LoW every 5 minutes.
     
  4. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    Thank you for admitting that there is nothing wrong with this idea.
     
  5. It was a typo.
     
  6. Uhr_Drago

    Uhr_Drago User

    How would they get the 4mill shields?
    Would u prefer the damage be equal to just the laser damage caused by the equipped ship instead?
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2015
  7. imapoofya

    imapoofya User

    4 mil shields - normal, shared shield booster, shield engineering, bastion sentinel solace spectrum or kick, ring, hercules, upgrades. Sentinel would "add" more too via resistances. Also no I would not prefer it to be equal to damage caused by equipped ship instead. Even if they use just lf-3 that's still even more than the original idea would've caused. In just 5 seconds an UFE with lf-3 can easily cause up to 500k damage, and the duration of this "ability" hasn't even been posted yet.
     
  8. Use the kami OP - hahaha :oops:
     
  9. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    Designs and UFE???
    The cost would be 50k uri.
    "It will not activate in any enemy company maps or space stations and is incompatible with any ship designs and Lf-4's. It will be restricted to just pilots with less than 30 pilot points in bio abilities."

    I'm sorry but I believe this was overlooked and as far as time limit goes.
    "This effect only happens if more than the target of your attack is firing on you."
     
  10. imapoofya

    imapoofya User

    Wasn't overlooked at all. Re-read what we've posted please.
     
  11. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    I did and the answer is still there, ok I'll make it simple.
    No time limit, it comes on when more than the target ur shooting is shooting u.
    It goes away when just the target ur shooting is shooting u.

    There, I've done it again.
    It is explained in a way for anyone to understand.

    Your welcome.
     
  12. Bakjam

    Bakjam User

    I would want to agree (it sounds like a good idea), but now I must say no, if you accumulate all weapon systems and droneformations, this game is already way to hard, especially if you do not have a second slot bar. Bigpoint must balance speed and weaponstrength first before they introduce new weapons. More and more it is just getting a trolling game because you can't win anyway. What I mean by this is that I just use my abilities or ammo, so that someone else has to as well, just to annoy them because you don't stand a chance against them in a 1v1.

    Restrictions would make it even worse, the strong people would once again become stronger while weaker people become weaker. Stop making the diffrences between weak and strong bigger.
     
  13. Hell no. Hell no. Your explanations aren't the issue your idea is just terrible and OP. You're not processing our feedback...
     
  14. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    What would make this idea not overpowered?
    I've taken it away from users of lf-4's, ship designs and pilots with more than 30 pp in bio.
    How do the restrictions make it worse when the restriction ideas came from u guys and would it be better if only 50% of the damage were possible instead?


    Please elaborate your answers, ur current answers have become irrational.
     
  15. imapoofya

    imapoofya User

    Too many restrictions that would be unfair and confuse players to no end. Not to mention even with those restrictions there are still easy bypasses to making it OP af. No to the whole idea from me.
     
  16. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    Thank you for ur input.
    I expected more in elaboration but meh, as long as that is ur last post in this thread i'll just take what little u offered.
     
  17. Note: The thread will be re-opened only if the OP requests for it.

    Enjoy the game.

    Closing due to inactivity.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.