Clans should not have a multiple company option

Discussion in 'General Archive' started by [PΛЯΛĐΘX]™, May 5, 2014.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
  1. If the leader makes a clan in that company then it should be a clan solely for that company. I see clans exploiting this allowing them to have certain clan members popping their company members and it isn't fair.
     
    prometheis2000[ITGS] likes this.
  2. We just war the clans with cross company members.
    Or better yet do a alliance. There is nothing like seeing a green enemy dot in a enemy map lighting the way for me to kill them..:cool:
     
  3. Raveman100

    Raveman100 User

    We had an EIC from a multicompany clan killing other EIC in invasion just so his clan's company (MMO) could win the invasion gate. Talk about low.
     
  4. so if they have friends in another company and they don't want to shoot them they cannot be in the same clan? like our clan we were all the same company and most moved but some who had ranks like general or colonels didn't want to move and lose them so they didn't and stayed in the clan while the others including the leader moved to EIC


    lets also have it that different clans from different companies cannot have alliances or naps because that would be unfair on others as well...


    Btw Paradox wasn't you in [WaR>] clan while you was VRU and they were MMO just saying : )))) ?
     
  5. or as this wont happen maybe clans with members on different companies should be given an earning cap for kills. Example: Say the clan is mmo and has some eic members. The eic and mmo clan members should get a severe cap on kills against fellow mmo and eic and shooting members in your own clan on the other companies should be treated like - honor for killing friendlies.