Defense mode Chip

Discussion in 'General Archive' started by VESPID, Jan 27, 2014.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BOSS~ADAM

    BOSS~ADAM User

    The counter attack is stop sleeping at the wheel and shoot back yourself or run like hell, legal autolocks is probably the worst idea I've ever seen, I can't even comprehend why you think this is needed.
     
  2. VESPID

    VESPID User

    Or have this tech and go cubing without having to run.
     
  3. BOSS~ADAM

    BOSS~ADAM User

    Is your mindset that this tech makes players invincible and they wouldn't have to run when cubing because they could autolock enemies? Quite the opposite, they'd be vulnerable since the Prot's would be damaging the defender and the enemy would come and instant pop them, they don't have to run, they can autolock and have there ship do barrel rolls while they get popped, that's if they want an idea like this in the game.

    I know I don't, legal autolocks, the most ridiculous idea you've come out with Vespid, close this thread as this is going nowhere, do you expect the developers to put something like this into the game? I think not.
     
  4. VESPID

    VESPID User

    Not invincible, just more capable of returning fire.
    I actually do think this idea should be implemented for every reason that I have presented in this post already.
     
  5. BOSS~ADAM

    BOSS~ADAM User

    Well of course the creator of an idea would want it, the developers wouldn't care how much you want it and wouldn't implement it, you have to think about what the game really needs or what players may want, this isn't either of those, legal autolocks are a bad idea, they're more capable because they have a chip do everything for them, making lazy pilots as well.
     
  6. VESPID

    VESPID User

    I'll leave the implementing and choices to them and just try to keep the forum members on topic here......."Stay on topic please."
     
  7. can a mod close this thread since vespid can't take a no for an answer and its not on topic any more ?
     
  8. VESPID

    VESPID User

    Will a mod please ban every forum member that can't stay on topic.
    Thank you.
     
  9. so u would want to be banned .? well then .we can play it like this also .can a mod ban every forum user that can't take no for an answer . always contradicts players that say no to his idea .spams the forum with stupid ideas and always acts like a 5 y/p aka vespid .. yeah thx
     
  10. VESPID

    VESPID User

    The Chip I'm proposing boosts the pilots counter attack abilities by priming the weapons system to launching an automatic counter attack against any pilot that fires on your ship.

    Each auto-lock takes 50 xenomit.
    The suggested price would be 30K Uri.

    TOPIC. <-----Please stay on it.
     
  11. BOSS~ADAM

    BOSS~ADAM User

    Most players know how damaging autolocks and other battle cheats have been to the game, introducing a legal autolock would be the most ridiculous thing DO could ever do, it would be going backwards from banning them to selling them, I don't know why you can't see that this is a terrible idea, you need to accept that, legal autolocks are not what the game needs, they aren't a good defense, this idea would destroy the game.
     
  12. VESPID

    VESPID User

    The illegal programs are destroying the game, this is a fighting chance against at least one of them.....Are you actually defending bots???

    I ask because this idea would be a counter to at least one of them and none of you guys seem to want to see that point.

    Hey D.O. do you see what I see on this post???
     
  13. Stay on topic...yada yada yada. Why do you always pull that card out? Your ideas are seriously messed up. No clue what's going through your mind, but it's not good. Stop making this rubbish. You want autolock? Seriouslyo_O NO!
     
  14. VESPID

    VESPID User

    Please offer assisting suggestions to improve this idea.
    Thank you.
     
  15. Naw, I'm good. I'd rather offer assisting suggestions about how this idea is introducing legal cheating into the game.

    Now if you really want autolock, I know this cool virus-inducing website:rolleyes:...
     
    cooljak96 likes this.
  16. VESPID

    VESPID User

    keep it, I have no need for it......Why do YOU have it???
    Please stay on topic.
     
  17. no . again .stay on topic and take no for an answer
     
  18. -HarleyD-

    -HarleyD- User

    No.

    Autolock is autolock. Autofire is Autofire. No matter how you dress it up or call it a fancy name you are suggesting a legal bot.

    CLOSED.
     
    -Tom_Sawyer- likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.