The Midas Design

Discussion in 'General Archive' started by R3V3R4NT, Feb 22, 2015.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    I would like to have a design that is compatible will all ships and that offers the following:
    1) x2 cargo bay expansion.
    2) 10% increase to cargo box loot.
    3) 10% increase to bonus box uri.
    4) -15% damage penalty.

    The color of the design would be gold and purple.

    The preferable price would be 135k uri and auction availability.

    Thank you all for your current and continued suggestions, please tell me what you think.
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2015
    Dreadlok likes this.
  2. There shouldn't be a 10% increase to bonus box uri, as it can relate to botting, users would abuse this design only for uri.
     
  3. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    Considering the bot problem I'll leave that to D.O. to manage.
    Perhaps they can use items like this one to track or identify the bot users.
     
  4. For this, there is already a cargo expansion CPU, and BIO settings.
     
  5. I was thinking something similar a while ago, but rather it would be a drone formation That would allow 5% extra ep, 3% extra honor and 2% extra uri.
     
  6. Seraphim

    Seraphim User

    It should have a negative buff considering those bonuses are very good.
     
  7. Perhaps an HP & Shield reduction of 50%? Or, Hp & Shield increase by 20%, but damage decrease by about... I dunno, 40%?
    That seems like something you'd risk. Sustainability OR high bonus box rewards :D
     
  8. Dreadlok

    Dreadlok User

    KilerStreak is right, there needs to b a negative counterbalance.
    Like -5% damage and cloaks don't work with this item.
     
  9. If you can't cloak with it nobody will use it. If it's a speed reduction nobody will use it. If it's a shield/hp reduction maybe people will use it depending on how much. If it's a damage reduction nobody cares because it's a boxing design not pvp design. Damage reduction is pointless. The idea for this is not very... Workable. Why get more box uri when you can get more boxes because spearhead is smaller, is faster, and has more oh crap abilities? I don't see why anyone would use this. Not bashing the idea I just think it needs more consideration

    At that point the risk overtakes the bonus

    You could say the same about seprom or boosters could you not yet they exist
     
    Last edited by moderator: Feb 23, 2015
  10. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    Alright fooj, I'll take your advice and impose a -15% dmg neg to this item.
     
  11. Not sure where you were going with this...
     
  12. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    He was pointing out alternate game redundancies that are currently employed as brought up by your earlier post to dismiss this threads idea as not needed.
     
  13. Gotcha, and thanks. Multiple ways to do the same thing are really not needed as they tend to leave one to be confused about what path to take.
     
  14. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    I understand your perspective, I personally treasure an option rich environment.
     
  15.  
  16. While true, redundancy? Really? o_O
     
  17. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    I can't help but think the price is listed too high, what are your thoughts?
     
  18. For what it's giving don't think it's too high at all.

    Would the BB uri and BB boosts stack for 20% more box uri or only only 10%?
     
    Last edited by moderator: Mar 1, 2015
  19. R3V3R4NT

    R3V3R4NT User

    That's a good question, I wonder if he means those cargo boxes from farming npc's.
     
  20. more design for all ships including credit ships
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.