[UI] Change the GG Chance System

Discussion in 'General Archive' started by HeyItsMe!!, Apr 17, 2016.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HeyItsMe!!

    HeyItsMe!! User

    hi space pilots, its me again :)

    after i had some bad moments trying to get full havoc and now i'm having the same trying to get full hercules, (i remember i almost cry after do 5 zetas consequently in a month and got nothing) i really got mad (don't know why i'm still in the game, maybe its a bit additive).

    i have seen a lot of people hating and blaming the chance system of rewards too. and because this chance system i have seen people looking for a glitch, bug or trick to get the design and no one have it, although i think would be illegal in the game.

    then i propose change the chance system to 20% in every gate but they are accumulative, and it will take 5 gates as maximum to get an item (havoc or hercules or LF4)

    then would be like this:
    1st Zeta,Epsilon,Kappa=20% of possibilities, maybe u can get one design-laser maybe no
    2nd zeta,Epsilon,Kappa=40% of possibilities, maybe u can get one design-laser maybe no
    3rd zeta,Epsilon,Kappa=60% of possibilities, maybe u can get one design-laser maybe no
    4th zeta,Epsilon,Kappa=80% of possibilities, maybe u can get one design-laser maybe no
    5th zeta,Epsilon,Kappa=100% of possibilities, definitely u will get the damn design-laser

    after the 5th gate completed, in the 6th one, the count will start in 20% again
    if the design has been achieved, for example in the 3rd gate, the next one will start in 20% again

    then i also suggest to make kappa only for hercules, and leave the LF4 for epsilon, i think few people make epsilon now, and the multibooster could be sold in the shop

    the idea is u can get the design in any of those amount of gates (1-5);if u are lucky enough u could get it even in the first one, but if u are unlucky u are going to receive in the fifth one as maximum.

    maybe its too much because around 50 gates to be full havoc-hercules but it wouldn't be so easy to the newbies get UFE, but eventually they will do it :).

    i'm open minded to positive and negative opinion, please write why yes or why no.
    cheers
     
  2. The issue that comes to mind IS, D O will want the entire 20% for the item and if you got one on the first gate done then you will have to do upto 9 before you get another item. I do agree the CHANCE needs to be removed from the game, however, I feel it should be a GIVEN reward. This being said, I feel the gates that give more items (i.e. Kappa) you will receive one of the Special rewards for EVERY gate you complete (whether Drone Design, LF-4, or Booster) and when doing the gate if the Hangar doing the gate already has the designs assigned to it they are removed from the CHANCE list (so you would want to assign the designs to another hangar if trying for the design, would also apply to the LF-4's, thus a player would know they would get a BOOSTER if they had all Designs and LF-4's on the ship doing the gate). Yes the Chance would be gone and the farmers would know what they were getting, but so would the rest of the population.

    The biggest issue, CURRENTLY, is the allocation system seems to be issuing the special items every so many completed (by the entire community/server) gates and every so many gates they give the items, meaning a person who is completing a gate with say 4 others doing the same gate at the same speed, these 5 players complete the gate in the same order and one person is getting all of the special rewards and the others are not getting anything, this would be the cycle set by D O and is why some people can get these items on every gate they do and others don't get them after several gates (same type).

    I know it will get a bunch of P2W up in arms but they really need to put the LF-4 in SHOP so it can be purchased by the FREE player.
     
    OrbitGuru likes this.
  3. Once everyone has LF4 then the 5 will appear and we will start the whole mess over again.....in my humble opinion...
     
    HeyItsMe!! likes this.
  4. Polls are not permitted in this section ;)

    I like this idea, it can be very frustrating, if you have a misfortune streak. The chances are one of the reasons, why you can hate this game. Your idea can work with the green Booty chests too.

    If they do that, there will be no reason to buy the (for some ppl) disappointing green Booty keys.
     
    HeyItsMe!! likes this.
  5. HeyItsMe!!

    HeyItsMe!! User

    hi i didn't know about the forbidden poll and i don't know how to delete it, can u help me in that?

    about the booty keys i dont think is a good idea to change them to accumulative because they give a lot of good things, u could get UFE easily, thats why i'm saying the kappa could be just for hercules, is just a part of being UFE.
     
  6. :oops:, only a moderator can help you.
     
    HeyItsMe!! likes this.
  7. HeyItsMe!!

    HeyItsMe!! User

    how are u going to do up-to 9 gates? its suppose every gate is equal to 20%, 9 would be equal to 180%, after achieving it in the first gate, u must do 5 gates more as maximum, would be around 6 gates for two items

    it cant be a given reward, everybody would get it so easy, everybody would be UFE in few days, farmers, bot users or clan or company who owns palla

    no, the equipped things must no do anything with the chance system, then we would talking about tricks, thats no the idea, the idea is you will get the item with patience, u wont be full in two weeks but eventually u will

    the chance must stay, but in a better way, u don't play a game hoping to reach the maximum lvl in 1 week

    NO, the LF4 mustn't be in the shop, the wallet warriors and the bot users will get them, the free users wont, most of free users are people which have no money or don't want to invest money in a game
     
  8. This was a hypothetical for how D O would want to have a 20% Guarantee set up , meaning you would get an item for every 5 gates done but would have to do the full 5 before it reset, unlike the suggested reset at the point of collecting the item.

    No, the items still need to be fully upgraded before they are true UFE.

    The only reason for this is some people do not want or need LF-4's (already have a bunch of extras) or Drone designs and thus would prefer the booster instead and this would be a way to give a choice to the reward instead of the automatic award of something you may not want.

    The chance is not a FAIR method of giving the items to players. A player receiving a special reward for every gate completed and another not receiving a single reward after doing a dozen or more gate is proof of this.


    In SHOP everyone could get them with a little work, wallets have always got things faster than anyone else, but in shop it might get some other people off the dime and might even get some of the people to come back to the game who left because their luck is not as good as others.
     
    HeyItsMe!! likes this.
  9. HeyItsMe!!

    HeyItsMe!! User

    well, there are people who has made more than 12 zetas and they will have around 2 or 3 havocs, then would not be so much difference
     
  10. HeyItsMe!!

    HeyItsMe!! User

    @HelpMeHelpYou in fact i though in making 3 gates for every item with something like 33% per gate, but i know DO team won't do it so easy, thats why i'm making 5 gates as maximum
    and yes, the chance system is not fair, thats why i'm making this idea
     
  11. OrbitGuru

    OrbitGuru User

    your idea actually doesnt seem bad for gates. they really need to remove chances from this game, except less needed things like booty keys, and building gates (though odds for gate parts need to go up. 3k spins for most of a kappa is just rude)..
     
    HeyItsMe!! likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.