[UI] Multi Company Clans

Discussion in 'General Archive' started by ∞§†ØÑΣMΔ§ØÑ∞, Apr 29, 2016.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BAN THEM.

    Make it impossible for anyone to join a clan which is or was founded in another company.
    I think this would make the game better if it was brought in.
    If you don't agree with this I don't want to hear about it.
     
  2. I 100% agree with you. I hate multi-company clans so much, it brought a higher ruling to the game. No one cared for it back then, then people got smart enough that they manage to rule the server now.
     
  3. space~cake

    space~cake User

    Multi company clans are exploiting the game and something needs to be done about it. They send war to everyone and rack up kills from every company all day long. They should get rid of the option to join a clan if that clan is not in your company. Myself and some friends were in 4-5 minding our own business and an nme player tried it on with us so we dealt with him a few times, so he called for backup. That backup came in the form of a player that was in his clan but from my company, so this guy sent us war so he could help and protect an nme player.
    So now we have a war with a much stronger clan that is in all three companies and have members what seems to be in every map. All because we were defending ourselves from an nme. I asked the guy who was from my company why send us war and shoot us. He replied because we shot his clan member. Well im sorry but what are we supposed to do, let this nme kill us over and over just so we can avoid a war where we get killed over and over by this multi company clan. No wonder people dont like joining clans anymore. These people in these types of clans are exploiting the game and killing it at the same time.
    People lose honor when changing company's for a reason, because its not honorable to swap sides. These people, however get away with this all day long and actually gain honor for shooting their own company. Whats up with that.:confused::mad::eek:
     
  4. It has been brought up in other threads and the answer from D O has become a standard reply "the populations are so low they can not do anything to deter the actions of these players". YES they are destroying the game, YES they go against every concept of what this game was ORIGINALLY designed for, YES they cause more people to quit than belong to these clans, but it is an acceptable method of playing that D O is willing to allow to happen. Be thankful the same company person sent WAR to your clan before they started attacking you, usually they allow the enemy member of their clan to get the red lock and then assist them in killing you (also without losing any honor) or worse yet target you and guide their enemy members to your location so they can kill you.

    I stand by my suggestion of creating a 4th company, they have no maps of their own, they are enemies in any map they are in, they can only get missions from the nyx's of the company they were originally registered in. This alleviates the need to send WAR as they are enemies to everyone, it removes them from the Ranks of the Company hierarchy (they don't care about loyalty to the company any way) and it now allows us to KNOW if they will defend us or help kill us as they are no longer a friendly color.
     
    -oversoulpaul- likes this.
  5. Aslea

    Aslea User

    Hey guy, this is forum. Everybody can express his opinion. Of course decently :p

    I don´t like this kind of players too. Unfortunatelly, they can´t get ban, because this thing is allowed. I think it should be adjust. I would deduct a honour to everybody, who cooperate with clan or members from foreign firm.
     
  6. space~cake

    space~cake User

    Well if DO are happy with people using this legal cheat and exploit the game then so be it. But we need more people to back the idea of getting rid of the option to be in a clan from another company then maybe they will look at this problem and do something about it. The same company person didn't send war right away he did use the assist attack first. They both failed, but funnily enough one of my friends lost honor because he was defending us from an attack. Then he sent war so he could directly attack us. I also think that any player that shoots the same company should lose honor even if they didn't shoot the target first.

    To your idea, we don't need a 4th company when we have multi company clans. It will just be the same situation but we would have clans that have members in 4 companies not just 3. If you are suggesting that this 4th company can only have clans that have members that are only from that company, then all you are saying is that you are agreeing with getting rid of the option to have multi company clans.

    If however, you are suggesting that this 4th company's members are all clanless, then all that would happen is that all the strongest players would join and dominate the entire server. Then they would gain a shed load of experience and honor from ship kills then rejoin one of the other three companies and gain a better user rank.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2016
    -oversoulpaul- likes this.
  7. Yes you are right, I do apologize for saying "If you don't agree with this I don't want to hear about it." I was venting :D. As multi company clans really make my blood boil.:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: Their members have no honor and are taking fairness and respect out of the game.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2016
    Aslea likes this.
  8. NO the 4th company is made up of ONLY MCC clans. It is a punishment for making a MCC. You have NO SAFE MAPS, you are RED to everyone including other MCC's, they DO NOT have their own maps to play in.

    The purpose of the 4th company is to help the LOYAL company players know when they have an ENEMY near them, including the same company player who is in a MCC, as they are probably guiding one of their friends to your location.

    There is no selection to join the 4th company (except by making the clan MCC) you can say the clan has NO company affiliation and remain with the company but once you accept a member of an enemy company you become 4th company.

    This suggestion was made after it was commented on by the Mods that D O was unwilling to address this issue as they previously done because the servers were already so low in population.
     
  9. T
    If they were to do all that, it would take more work to implement it. Would be better if they just got rid of the option to join a MMC. I believe over time it will help the population or rather slow down the decreasing numbers of active players.
     
  10. As other threads on the subject have stated those wanting to be MCC would just create their own company clans and NAP the enemy clans and then war everyone so they could still do what they are doing now. Only difference in that would be between the three companies you would have a clan of 50 like minded players teaming with 100 more (other 2 companies) to do what the current 50 member clan is doing. Remember these players are FRIENDS with each other and have formed the MCC so they can play together without having to switch companies causing them to lose so much honor.

    With the 4th company these clans are removed from the 3 company hierarchy and placed in, say Jupiter, company. This clan stays the same base players and if the members leave the clan they return to the company they originally were in. But the same conflicts continue between the MCC's as before and they are still limited to the 50 person clan. Again, even in the 4th company NONE of the clans are blue tagged to anyone, they may be yellow tagged but never blue or green.

    Any changes made will affect the game in one form or another. MCC's are usually Veteran players spending money on the game either to do G G's or buy ammo/boosters. D O is the one who has voiced the concern in their removing these TOP players (by way of the mods), and the MCC's have voiced what they would do if the MCC's were eliminated. Thus the only option to get around the issue would be the 4th company but then no one likes this either, so LIVE with the MCC's as nothing is going to be done about them.
     
  11. Hi all,

    Thanks for your input into this. It has been passed along to support and we are awaiting a response on it. Remember though that this is a major change in game dynamics and, as mentioned in the 1st Twitch feed, these changes have to be well considered. That said, I believe there is enough of a ground swell of opinion that this needs to be looked at.

    We'll keep pushing it ;)

    Regards

    NM
     
    WiccaDio, KilerStreak and jackknife like this.
  12. Yup - MCCs need to go...can't even trust your own colors o_O Who is who - what is what :rolleyes: Who cares what the MCCs will do if that their function is removed. The game is getting ruined day by day. Yeah, keep pounding those nails in. The nme is the nme period not your Co. :rolleyes:
     
    WiccaDio and xuhu99 like this.
  13. I do believe MCCs are a problem but getting rid of them wont change anything tho, for example ... (NO MCCs allowed anymore) lets say MMO clan would just alliance with other company clans and you will still have the same problem as you would with a MMC.

    But as HelpMeHelpYou said ^ 4th company idea is the only way you could solve the MMC issue I believe
     
  14. WiccaDio

    WiccaDio User


    My response to BP is MERGE SERVERS THEN. If the population is too low then merge lower pop servers together. That way there are tons of people per server and it will make the game more immersive, like it was back in 07-08. If they merged the servers, then they wouldn't have an issue eliminating multi company clans and keeping clans in company because the server population would be at a stable high.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2016
  15. How does this even relate to MCC's? Making the same post in every thread is not proper either.
     
  16. WiccaDio

    WiccaDio User

    if you read above the response from BP to us that they cant change game mechanics is because of low population. Repeating similar responses is relevant to a reoccurring issue that the server populations are down. It's not spam if it's an issue that needs to be addressed and fixed. If you go in multiple threads and the same issue is, not enough players, or lag, or something similar in every one, its important as an active community member to voice your opinion, even if it is a repeated comment. If it applies somehow to the OP's issue, and the fix for the issue is the same as someone else's issue that they have, then it should show Big Point the priority level for certain things.

    Hence why moderators thank us for giving input, im sure they go through all the forums and tally up what has been talked about and how often. If we can all voice our opinions and assist, they make more money and we are happy because we helped shift an already amazing game into an even better one.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2016
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.