[UI] Multi purchase auction

Discussion in 'General Archive' started by VESPID, Sep 3, 2015.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. VESPID

    VESPID User

    The proposal I'd like to make here is the option of getting several items at a time from auction at the winning bid price.
    Say u bid 20 mill on an lf3 or b02 and win the item, offer the option to purchase several of the same item all at once with the winning bid price if you can afford to do so.
     
  2. Interesting idea but takes away from the point of the auction. You are bidding on the chance to win one item, unless otherwise stated for the item.
     
  3. Oh my, you're back VESPID. No, auction is fine how it is, this just takes away the point of it being an Auction.
     
  4. VESPID

    VESPID User

    Actually it would improve the auction by speeding the process for the ones that can afford to get all of what they want at one time and allow someone else the chance to gain from the auction instead of waiting hours or days to get what they need after the credit giants have what they want.
     
  5. That's not how auctions work though, you don't win something then go, oh ill spend more credits like that for more, cause some places or some times you can win something for just 1 mil.
     
  6. VESPID

    VESPID User

    Well yea, that is the charm of the auction.
    Wouldn't it be sweet if it was you?
     
  7. No, it makes auction worthless, like saying make lf3 and bo2 for credits.
     
  8. Not a good idea at all..
    On my server lf3's go fro 15-20 mil, it would be so easy for newbs to get lf3's and bo2's then..
    Auction is the best it can be and it doesn't need changes...
     
  9. VESPID

    VESPID User

    Are u guys saying there should be a minimal bid limit to qualify?
    If so what should the minimal bid be to allow for multi purchase of an item with a winning bid?
     
  10. Nobody alluded to what you are asking about.
     
  11. This has to be at the top of the list of most useless idea's...
     
  12. Just win the same item over and over spread out over 7 hours :rolleyes:
     
  13. There should be no multi purchase, how can u not understand?
    Sheesh..
    The games is where it needs to be, we need more noobs cuz there are too many UFE's already roaming and blowing stuff up..
     
  14. VESPID

    VESPID User

    I beg to differ, there needs to be more FE's uber or not. The game is dying because noobs don't stay unless they are just alternate accts of the UFE to expand on their in game death lists.
     
  15. The game needs balance which it doesn't have.. We need balance between noobs, FE's and UFE's... Combining servers would help a little with that..
     
  16. VESPID

    VESPID User

    Merging servers will probably happen some time after they put Lf-4"s in shop.
    But yea this idea would also help to open up the auction more frequently.
     
  17. LF4's could be put in shop only if there would come out LF5's in their place... and that wont happen..
     
  18. The auction is fine the way it is. Be thank full that the credits are returned, when you loose a bid. They did not use to be returned.
    And a side note, LF5 would be the death of this game, in my humble opinion.
     
  19. Neither of those is gonna happen. DO said it themselves "LF-4s will remain as a gained item, not a purchased item"
    And as i have said, and was backed by admins on this "A server merge won't happen due to the amount of risks (Accounts getting deleted/lost) which would be a major issue"
     
  20. Still they have to seriously think about server merge..
    They are losing players, and if there are not many players on a server, they will lose some more.. (Not talking about the UFE's) those dudes will never leave..
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.